Home / Services / Tax Credit Controversy

Tax Credit Controversy

The Employee Retention Credit (ERC), a refundable tax credit provided by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as part of COVID-19 relief, has garnered increased attention and scrutiny. The heightened focus is a result of the widespread occurrence of fraudulent claims and the utilization of aggressive and predatory tactics by certain service providers, commonly referred to as “ERC mills”.

Line

Employee Retention Credit (ERC) Audit Resolution

Sagemont Advisors' Tax Credit Controversy

As the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) continues to intensify its focus on fraudulent claims, uncertainty looms for many business owners regarding the status of their ERC claims. At Sagemont Advisors, our team of ERC experts stand ready to assist clients in current or potential ERC audits. Sagemont Advisors performs a thorough a review of previously filed claims to ensure both the eligibility analysis and ERC calculation were performed accurately and stands ready to assist in any ERC-related requests from the IRS.

Sagemont Advisors' Tax Credit Controversy

If you think that you have worked with an ERC mill or an inexperienced advisor, you should consider having an ERC expert take a second look at your claim.

The ERC legislation encompasses intricate regulations regarding entity aggregation, PPP/ERC interaction, employee count, gross receipts declines, and the impact of governmental orders on your business – all necessitating the review of an experienced professional. Due to the intricate nature of the eligibility tests and exercises, numerous businesses might have inadvertently submitted inaccurate claims.

The repercussions of filing an erroneous ERC claim, whether intentional or not, can be severe and formidable. Consequences may involve the obligation to repay the credit, potentially with additional interest charges and penalties. In some instances, businesses may face criminal liability for adopting fraudulent tax positions.

Drawing from the insights of our professionals at Sagemont Advisors, there are key areas where unknowing taxpayers can be subject to the pitfalls of misguided advice or inadvertently file improper claims.

Improper reliance or overapplication of the partial suspension of operations eligibility test, such as relying on any of the following arguments to support a partial suspension of operations may put your eligibility position at risk:

Restrictions or modifications solely under OSHA and CDC (more on the OSHA position here); Customer shutdowns or reduced customer demand; Inability to hold sales meetings in person; Inventory costs increased; Shift to virtual workforce with comparable operations; Trade shows were canceled; or Mask or vaccine...

(+ Show More)

Improper reliance or overapplication of the partial suspension of operations eligibility test, such as relying on any of the following arguments to support a partial suspension of operations may put your eligibility position at risk:

  • Restrictions or modifications solely under OSHA and CDC (more on the OSHA position here);
  • Customer shutdowns or reduced customer demand;
  • Inability to hold sales meetings in person;
  • Inventory costs increased;
  • Shift to virtual workforce with comparable operations;
  • Trade shows were canceled; or
  • Mask or vaccine mandates.
(- Show Less)

Faulty or weak supply chain arguments without a supporting governmental order are a red flag.

Note, for a business to claim a partial suspension due to a government order impacting their supplier, it must: (i) have had a supplier that couldn’t make deliveries of critical goods or materials due to a government order; and (ii) couldn’t procure those critical goods from an alternate source.

Faulty or weak supply chain arguments without a supporting governmental order are a red flag.

Note, for a business to claim a partial suspension due to a government order impacting their supplier, it must: (i) have had a supplier that couldn’t make deliveries of critical goods or materials due to a government order; and (ii) couldn’t procure those critical goods from an alternate source.

(- Show Less)

Failure to accurately apply the full-time employee (FTE) count test may invalidate your ERC claim.

This is often caused by the nonapplication of the aggregation rules (requiring that certain related entities must be treated as a single employer) and incorrectly utilizing the count for the single entity versus the FTE count for the aggregated group.

Failure to accurately apply the full-time employee (FTE) count test may invalidate your ERC claim.

This is often caused by the nonapplication of the aggregation rules (requiring that certain related entities must be treated as a single employer) and incorrectly utilizing the count for the single entity versus the FTE count for the aggregated group.

(- Show Less)

Failure to avoid double-dipping on ERC and PPP Wages as many ERC mills either purposely or unknowingly fail to ensure that none of the employer’s PPP-covered wages are used to calculate ERC-eligible wages.

Failure to avoid double-dipping on ERC and PPP Wages as many ERC mills either purposely or unknowingly fail to ensure that none of the employer’s PPP-covered wages are used to calculate ERC-eligible wages.

(- Show Less)

Misapplication of large employer credits, enabling sizable corporations (i.e., over 500 FTEs in 2019) to claim credits on wages paid to employees that fall outside of the purview of not performing services;

Misapplication of large employer credits, enabling sizable corporations (i.e., over 500 FTEs in 2019) to claim credits on wages paid to employees that fall outside of the purview of not performing services;

(- Show Less)

Relying on a revenue decline within a business segment rather the overall company (or aggregated group); and Other vague arguments (e.g., not tied to a specific governmental order).

Relying on a revenue decline within a business segment rather the overall company (or aggregated group); and Other vague arguments (e.g., not tied to a specific governmental order).

(- Show Less)
Why work with Sagemont Advisors?

THE SAGEMONT DIFFERENCE

Why work with Sagemont Advisors?

When it comes to ensuring the accuracy and legitimacy of your ERC claim or defending against an ERC audit, the expertise of seasoned professionals, including CPAs and tax attorneys, is essential. To that end, the team of experts at Sagemont Advisors is available to:

  • Assist you in an ongoing ERC audit;
  • Assist you in substantiating and documenting your ERC eligibility, ensuring thorough preparation for a potential audit; and
  • Guide you in determining whether you should withdraw or reverse all or a portion of your ERC claim in connection with the IRS’s amnesty programs.